2019 M1x DEN
2016 M8+ St.Paul
2016 LM4- DEN
2016 W8+ Cornell

Axial force at the blade

Axial force at the blade

The finer points of oar mechanics were previously analysed in RBN 2020/12: discrepancies between propulsive forces derived at the blade and rower-boat system were found, and a hypothesis was raised about the possible contribution of the blade axial force. Since then, we have tried different ways of measuring the blade axial force directly with a sensor built in the shaft close to the blade. However, attempts were unsatisfactory because of high crosstalk from a large torque created by normal blade force. So, it was decided that axial blade force Fba would be determined indirectly, as a difference between the handle Fha and gate Fga axial forces:

Fba = Fha – Fga                                           (1)

To do this, a new type of force sensor was developed by BioRow (Fig.1), which was inbuilt into a handle of a sculling oar and can measure 4D forces:

  1. Axial handle force Fha;
  2. Horizontal (at squared blade) handle force Fhx;
  3. Vertical (at squared blade) handle force Fhy;
  4. Twisting torque at the handle Mh.

After the sensor was tested and the data analysed, it was found that the equation is not as simple as above (1). The reason was the bend of the oar shaft Abend (Fig.2), which makes the blade angle different from the gate angle relative to the boat. This means that the normal blade force Fbn transferred through the shaft is not orthogonal to the gate axis, so it can be decomposed into two components: normal Fgn(Fbn) and axial Fga(Fbn), which must be taken into the equation:

Fga(Fbn) = Fbn sin(Abend)                           (2)

The real axial force at the blade Fba created by water flow also transferred through the shaft to the gate as Fga(Fba) and also becomes slightly angled to the gate axis:

Fga(Fba) = Fba cos(Abend)                             (3)

The final equation used to derive the axial blade force Fba from the measured gate Fga and handle Fha axial forces was the following:

Fba = (Fha –(Fga + Fbn*sin(Abend)))/cos(Abend)     (4)

The normal blade force Fbn in this equation was derived from torques measured at the shaft (see RBN 2020/10), and the bend angle Abend - from the blade force Fbn using a shaft stiffness factor for each oar.

The data was collected in M1x (1.85m, 88kg) performed six pieces 15-20 strokes each with step-increasing stroke rate from 20 to 40spm. Fig.3 shows derived axial forces on the port-side Smoothie blade at the stroke rate 35.5spm:

As expected, the axial force measured at the handle Fha was significantly higher than at the gate Fga, a small part of the difference (max. 25N) can be explained by transferred axial component of the normal blade force Fga(Fbn), and the main part (max. 75N) should be related to a real axial blade force Fba.

Fig. 4 shows the real axial blade force Fba of the port-side Smoothie blade at various stroke rates, plotted together with corresponding blade work profiles:

During the first part of the drive, the axial blade force Fba was always directed inwards (from the blade to pin), and its magnitude increases with the stroke rate from about 20N up to 60N, which can be well explained by increased drag resistance at higher speed. After perpendicular oar position, the axial blade force Fba is directed outwards at low rates, which also can be explained by the drag, but at higher rates it was still directed inwards till the finish, though at smaller magnitude, less than 20N. This fact needs further interpretation, we can only guess that it could be related to the blade work profile: with increasing of the stroke rate, it is getting deeper after catch, but shallower before finish.

Concluding, the axial blade force was found to be quite significant: it can create up to a 70N braking force with two blades at oar angles 55deg, which is similar to the drag at the boat hull. Therefore, blade resistance at its axial movement through the water should be minimised.

Acknowledgements: Thanks to Concept2 Inc. and personally to Dick Dreissigacker and Alex Dunne for the interest and kind support of this study.

©2021 Dr. Valery Kleshnev www.biorow.com